Alice Neel portrait of Isabel Bishop

neel bishop

A 1974 oil portrait of Isabel Bishop painted by Alice Neel. Neel was born in 1900 and Bishop in 1902. Whereas Neel has been canonized by the Contemporary Art world, Bishop is all but completely ignored. In almost half a century of looking at art in museums I’ve only once seen an Isabel Bishop painting on display and that was at the art museum in Colorado Springs, hardly a major stop on a list of must-see art museums.  The reason Neel is esteemed and Bishop treated so shamefully is obvious. Neel paints in a recognizable Modern style (expressionist) whereas Bishop worked traditionally throughout her life, her paintings greatly influenced by Rubens. The extent to which this is true becomes more obvious when seeing the work in person. The painting I saw in Colorado Springs was a complete shock in that I’d seen Bishop’s work in reproduction but had no idea until seeing one of her paintings in person just how subtle, complex and brilliant it was.

To be clear, I’m not commenting at all on the relative merit of Neel and Bishop. I’m just pointing out the narrow ideological bias of contemporary art, where a painter of the highest achievement such as Bishop is ignored entirely whereas painters like Neel or O’Keefe are put on Olympian pedestals.

Bishop’s subjects were common working people, and her paintings capture life through the heart of the  20th century in New York City.

Isabel Bishop, Fourteenth Street, oil on masonite, ca. 1930

 

About trueoutsider

I'm an artist.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Alice Neel portrait of Isabel Bishop

  1. Found this page by accident. While i admire Neel’s paintings, and I agree with a lot you say about her work, I also agree and regret that Bishop’s work is not more honored. Her later work is more Modernist, at least influenced in that way – always a great artist apart from categories. I knew and admired her and her work. Norman Sasowsky

  2. trueoutsider says:

    Thanks, Norman.

    I’d like to see a lot more of Bishop, not to mention any number of other American traditional/representational artists… Soyers, Hyman Bloom, Jack Levine, Ivan Albright, Herb Herb Katzmann, Marsh, Phil Evergood, Ashcan school, etc. In other words, artists who largely stayed tied to the European/Old Master tradition and didn’t go along with the avant-garde imperatives (abstraction/flatness).

    I’d be interested in hearing about Bishop or anything else having to do with that period of American painting if you’d care to share your thoughts. Either here or email me at brjohnson125@gmail.com.

    best,
    Bart

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s