New Van Gogh book

The new book by Steven Naifeh and Gregory is postulating that van Gogh was shot rather than him taking his own life. We’ll have to await the evidence since the book isn’t out yet.

But if the distorted reproduction that the Independent chose to illustrate the article is anything like the book I wouldn’t put any faith in their theory.

Here’s the article, and take a good look at the Van Gogh self-portrait that illustrates it:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/did-van-gogh-die-in-an-unfortunate-brush-with-fate-2370919.html

Below are various versions of the same painting from a few other locations, which give an indication of why one should never pay much attention to any reproduced image of a painting without ever having seen it in person. That is if one is trying to get a really accurate idea of the painting itself. The pic on the Independent page is about the worst reproduction I’ve ever seen of the painting. It looks like they even compressed it along the horizontal axis, no doubt to fit the space for it in the article. It’s a general indication of how little mass (so-called) culture cares about anything to do with high culture. It seems to me that often the whole point of popular writing about great painting is to trivialize, sensationalize or wholly debase it. “Gee, everybody!!! Let’s all go have an art adventure!!! That kooky Van Gogh is always worth a good story!”



About trueoutsider

I'm an artist.
This entry was posted in Post Impressionists and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s